Monday, December 12, 2011

Latin ban in Great Britain

The councils who ban Latin words because they are 'elitist and discriminatory' and confuse immigrants, by Emily Andrews of the Daily Mail

Classics scholars have accused councils of 'ethnic cleansing' after they banned staff from using Latin words.

The local authorities claim the terms are elitist and discriminatory, and have ordered employees to use often-wordier alternatives in documents or when speaking to the public.

Bournemouth Council, which has the Latin motto Pulchritudo et Salubritas - beauty and health - has listed 19 terms it no longer considers acceptable for use. They include ad hoc, bona fide, status quo, vice versa and even via.

Its list of alternatives includes 'for this special purpose', in place of ad hoc and 'existing condition' or 'state of things', instead of status quo.

Mary Beard, a Cambridge professor of classics, said: 'This is absolutely bonkers and the linguistic equivalent of ethnic cleansing. 'English is and always has been a language full of foreign words. It has never been an ethnically pure language.'

Dr Peter Jones, co-founder of the charity Friends of Classics, said: 'This sort of thing sends out the message that language is about nothing more than the communication of very basic information in the manner of a railway timetable. But it is about much more than that. The great strength of English is that it has a massive infusion of Latin.

'We have a very rich lexicon with almost two sets of words for everything. To try to wipe out the richness does a great disservice to the language. It demeans it. I am all for immigrants raising their sights not lowering them. Plain English and Latin phrasing are not diametrically opposed concepts.'

Harry Mount, author of the best-selling book Amo, Amos, Amat and All That, a light-hearted guide to the language, said, 'Latin words and phrases can often sum up thoughts and ideas more often than the alternatives which are put forward.

'They are tremendously useful, quicker and nicer sounding. They are also English words. You will find etc or et cetera in an English dictionary.'

However, the Plain English Campaign congratulated the councils for introducing the bans. Marie Clair, its spokesman, said, 'If you look at the diversity of all our communities you have got people for whom English is a second language. They might mistake eg for egg and little things like that can confuse people. At the same time it is important to remember that the national literacy level is about 12 years old and the vast majority of people hardly ever use these terms. It is far better to use words people understand.'

Of other local authorities to prohibit the use of Latin, Salisbury has asked staff to avoid the phrases ad hoc, ergo and QED (quod erat demonstrandum), while Fife has banned ad hoc as well as ex officio.
Cum Lingua Latina proscripta erit tum soli proscript Latinam loquentur.
When Latin is outlawed, only outlaws will speak Latin.

Christmas Carols in Latin and Polish

A nice collection by Laura Gibbs.

American Racial History Timelines

by Prozium at Occidental Dissent:
1550-1860
1860-1900
1900-1960
1960-2008

Two Things Conservatives Need

1st, to realize that the democratic, egalitarian nightmare all around them is, largely, their own creation. As the French genius Tocqueville observed 150 years ago, "Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom." Only when they realize their own folly -- the deeply held but erroneous belief that everyone is the same -- will they be able to regain control of themselves and their country.

2nd, conservatives need to take back the liberal arts -- grammar, logic, rhetoric, great books, Latin and Greek, and all of that. They especially need to learn to tell a good story, to relearn the art of rhetoric. In this age of mass info-tainment, conservatives are so predictably modern and boring; they have no depth and their opinions are jerked higgledy-piggledy everyday by the likes of Limbaugh, Insanity, and Savage-Weiner. As a bonus, if conservatives took back the liberal arts, they would discover that they were also capturing the schools and the media as well without any added effort. A win-win for everyone.

Conservatism worthy of the name

From Deogwulf's Radical Conservative Reaction:
All conservatism worthy of the name is radical. It is little but a name for something petty if it does not wish to preserve the roots of good and harmonious order against the mechanical rot of progressivism. [1] All reaction worthy of the name is likewise radical. Again it is little but such a name if it does not wish to uproot all those modern growths which threaten to overwhelm the very possibility of the true, the good, and the beautiful. And common to both is a strict concern for more >>
How different is this noble old conservatism when compared with the "conservatism" of the RedTeam type.

AFA Book of Blotar and Ritual

a new book by Stephen McNallen of the Asatru Folk Assembly, a folkish group. Book description at Lulu.com:
This brand new book is filled with 18 blots to Asatru gods and goddesses and 13 rituals for every occasion, submitted by Asatru Folk Assembly members and ordained AFA Clergy. You'll find blots to Ostara, Thor, Ullr, Freya, Vidar and many more. There are landtakings, weddings, baby namings, man and woman making rituals and more - everything the modern Asatruar needs! You can use the blots and rituals as they are, or customize them for your personal use. The book is available in a coil-bound paperback format that will lay flat for ease of use or a downloadable PDF.
I don't know much about Asatru, and though it is interesting to me and I read the sagas and ancient myths, I do not practice. Let me know how you like the book.

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Misc

CWNY comes up with another informative and inspiring post, A Different World.

Akatra pays homage to Dieneces the Spartan, whom you may remember if you know the story of "The 300."

Article links from and a bio about a great classical scholar, Revilo Pendleton Oliver.

Tanstaafl adds some revealing color to Matt Drudge's "conservative" news coverage, and explains why Drudge and his kind are more likely to call Obama Hussein a Socialist, instead of the more accurate "Marxist." Read the whole thing, there's some very good and useful political history here.

Anti-White schemers

now in complete control of the United States government. Watch Rangel (African) and Reich (Jew) plot openly to cheat hard-working, professional White men out of their own money and jobs.

Think of the conditions necessary to allow these two thieves to discuss this so openly and without fear of censorship. That is the truth of where America stands now, White Man.

Thanks to Bo Sears, who also suggests that we let the White House know how we feel about this. Somehow, I don't think the White House would care, but here is the link anyway: http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

WorldNetDaily also reports on this plot against White men by the hostile, elite foreigners.

Friday, December 9, 2011

One of the biggest lies about Europeans

Most people today believe that America was "stolen" by White men from the sweet, innocent aborigines. An attentive person will read or hear this accusation at least once a month. Of course, anyone knowing even a little American history knows this rumor to be completely false, downright ridiculous, and completely absurd.

But most people today were raised by the Marxists and the Gnostics and their useful incompetents in our public school system. They don't know any real history and they believe this colossal lie.

If one wants to begin to discover the truth of the matter, here are some arresting facts you'll never hear in school, in the MSM, or from the government. The link is a preview of a DVD by New Century Productions.

BTW, my ancestors were here from the beginning. They were all of hard-working, honest, healthy English, Scottish, Welsh, and Irish stock. They were the first -- the original -- Americans. They fought murderous savages, built America, and spread civilization. All the good things enjoyed in this world came from Western Man (the White man). No apologies here. If there is any fault it is that we have tried too hard to please those who envy us and as a result are now fast becoming a hated minorities in our own countries.

But things are, thankfully, beginning to change. There is a great awakening occuring. Ever more of us are willing to say openly and defiantly: You multicultists, Marxists, and other assorted White-haters, take your White-guilt and your hateful names and go home, we'll not tolerate your nonsense any longer.

Quote of the Day

From Michael Hoffman:
A golem is a gentile monster created by rabbis to kill on their behalf. In modern terms, a golem would be a conservative Republican.
How perfectly true.

I would've put the word conservative in quotes myself, but upon reflection perhaps Hoffman is more correct. Most American conservatives have indeed become the enemies of a free republic and have now joined the liberals in the destruction of all things European, including themselves. They no longer want to conserve the old Republic, they simply want to conserve the status quo.

Justin Raimondo: typical liberal militant

Jared Taylor responds to Raimondo's Marxist, anti-White idiocy. A great article, suitable for forwarding to all. He ends with this:
And what if, like Mr. Raimondo, we are to put libertarianism before the preservation of race or heritage? Perhaps he has not noticed that it is only whites who have even imagined an individualism as pure as libertarianism. How many non-white allies has he found in his battle against the state? Does he really think Mexicans and Africans will help him dismantle state power rather than seize it for their own purposes? By ignoring race Mr. Raimondo is ensuring the failure of what I take to be his most cherished project.

Where Mr. Raimondo and I most clearly part company is that I am in earnest about the survival of my people and their civilization. For that I apologize to no one. If Mr. Raimondo does not see the crisis, he has every right to enjoy his ignorance, but he joins forces with the very multi-culturalists he claims to oppose when he denies to whites an awareness of their group interests without which they are doomed to oblivion.
Prozium comes in splendidly on this issue here, Svy here. Best comment to Svy's article is from Dasein:
It’s true that we could learn a lot from the Conservative Revolution in post-WWI Germany. But what’s up with ‘national community’ and the scare quotes- why not just say ethnic group or race? This is the whole problem with the Takitypes. They think that such a fundamental building block can be left out and whatever philosophy they adopt will still make sense. It’s like they want a return to old-fashioned omelette making, but they won’t say ‘you need eggs to do this’.

Fatherhood and Democracy

Laura Wood writes:
The ideal citizen in any high-functioning democracy is the father. He is more important politically than the mother; more important than the young man without children or the single woman; more important as a type than even the property owner. If I were to build an infant republic, I would limit the franchise to all fathers, of whatever race or creed, who were also property owners.

There may be great statesmen or thinkers who have no children, men such as Alexis de Tocqueville who possess vision and insight. There may be celibate spiritual leaders and occasionally a great woman leader. But, it is the ordinary father who is the human cell of democracy, without whom it cannot prosper over the long term.

In the father, the impersonal and personal, the abstract and concrete, the public and private are more likely to exist in the sort of harmony that makes for good political judgment. By father, I don’t mean any man who has biologically reproduced, but the man who takes part in rearing his children and has an active bond with them, whether they are young or adults. The man who never sees his children, has no interest in them, or only supplies compulsory financial support does not meet this definition.

For a woman, the world is too personal and parochial; she seeks security first. For the man without children, the future is sterile; even property or personal wealth will not make him care for those who will live many decades from now. The father is more apt to possess both public-spiritedness and loyalty, dispassion and compassion.

Patriarchy is often misunderstod. Too often it conjures images of despotic chiefs or overlords. A democratic patriarchy is the rule of ordinary fathers. As Pericles said in his famous funeral oration:

… for never can a fair or just policy be expected of the citizen who does not, like his fellows, bring to the decision the interests and apprehensions of a father.
Bene dictum, except for the democracy term. A proper patriarchal republic as Laura so sensibly advocates would be more aristocratic than democratic. Democracy is the enemy of aristos. The illusion of its benefits comes from the safety-minded. The very word promotes mediocrity and group-think over the aristocratic pursuit of excellence and the risk of failure.

Women of course play important roles in the maintenance of a healthy aristocracy, but "behind the scenes," as informal yet powerful social and cultural supporters and critics, nurturers of the patriarchs and of healthy families and communities, and upholders and examples of virtue.

It's a reciprocal arrangement. Virtuous women give good men something worth fighting for, something to protect, something to strive for, to better themselves for. Virtuous men arouse in women the desire to be faithful and supportive lovers, to have children, and to keep a more healthy, happy home.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Hannukah: A Nonsensical Talmudic Holiday

From Michael Hoffman's blog, On the Contrary:
Hannukah is a typical rabbinic charade. It takes the Biblical story of the Maccabees and embroiders it with fantasy. After their victory in 165 B.C., the Jews retook control of the remains of the temple, but it had been defiled. They wanted to rekindle its eternal flame, but they found only one small flask of consecrated oil. According to the Talmud, that small supply, enough for only one day, miraculously lasted for eight, which gave the Jews time to prepare new oil. And which gave the world Hanukkah, meaning "dedication" or "consecration" in Hebrew.

There is no oil that lasted eight days in the Biblical text. This story first appeared in the Talmud, which was concocted by rabbis who lived in Babylon after the destruction of the Temple.

The nonsensical miracle of the oil hoax has led to the rabbinic custom of eating foods fried in oil for Hanukkah. In the United States, the most popular is latkes, (potato pancakes).

The pagan/Babylonian root of Hannukah can be glimpsed in the fact that during Hannukah Talmudic children play a gambling game with a dreidel, a spinning top. Each side has a Hebrew letter. In most places, the letters spell "A Great Miracle Happened There."

In San Francisco for several years a huge Hannukah menorah was displayed in Union Square while the square had no Christian Nativity scene.

Traditionally in Judaism, Hannukah was a very minor observance. The contemporary emphasis on Hannukah was created as a rival to Christmas observances.

Has Israel become a strategic liability?

A Dutch documentary concerning the Jewish lobby in America, the U.S. relationship with Israel, and the near impossibility of speaking openly and honestly about Jewish money and power in America:



I salute the Roman response.
 

Goldman Sachs' highly improbable trades

still netting them billions. Read Tyler Durden's Another View At Goldman's Trading Perfection And Statistical Improbabilities and tell me we are not being plundered by the international money-changers. This is to me more confirmation on what Max Keiser has been saying about Goldman, that they have been using highly illegal and dishonest computer manipulation algorithms (amonst other nefarious methods) to cheat market trades. A comment from "AR":
GREAT report. Think of it... All of Goldman's competitors are taken out (for most part). The government retains Goldman to consult them on virtually ALL financial matters. Government, thus... allows Goldman to formulate policy, and gain inside information on all matters of policy. Goldman front-runs the entire marketplace. President Obama endorses these acts. Goldman borrows money from government (taxpayers). Then, Goldman STEALS from taxpayers, government, and all investors in the market (as evidence of the probabilities as shown above). Gentlemen, this is NOT called Democracy, Socialism, or even Communism. This is called THEFT by order of a legalized Ponzi Scheme enabled by the United States Government and your President. No one is safe anymore from the deceit, theft, and manipulation. Merry Christmas.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Tell your children

This debt is not theirs to bear.

A study of the history of aristocratic philosophy

In response to my entry last week, Mythos and the aristocratic ideal in the new republic, an anonymous poster offered this promising book, Nobilitas, by Dr. Alexander Jacob.   Gratias, Anonyme, tibi ago.

The only thing that might delay my purchase of the book is the remark from a reviewer that Jacob "leans" toward viewing Christianity as a slave religion. That is of course true now, but it was not always so, especially during its 1000+ year reign over Europe and European colonies. This might just be the reviewer's imagination.

Related -- I just came across this in my Dictionary of Foreign Phrases and Classical Quotations, by John Grant Edinburgh, 1908:
Ἡ δημοκρατία ἡ τελευταία τυραννὶς ἐστίν.
Democracy is the severest form of despotism. -- Aristotle
Quotations always look better in their original Klingonese, lugh?)

Monday, December 5, 2011

A primer on gold and banking in the West

The international money-swindlers and their local government accomplices, rigged markets, and more, Part I, by Robert Bradshaw.

Who is Morgan Freeman?

In the world of make-believe, he's honest but street-smart, a soft-spoken sage to White men everywhere. But that's just in the movies, the image put forth by that group of people we know and love so well. But who is he really? James Edwards has collected a bit of info which I suspect will be missing from his formal biography.

A silver lining

in CWYN's Friday essay, The Man on the White Horse:
It certainly will be much worse when white people are an actual minority in the previously European countries. But the white Christian has been a minority in the European nations for the last fifty years. “European” art, culture, language, religion and society already have been obliterated in the name of liberalism. What the liberals do not realize, however, is that when whites become a small minority in European countries, liberalism, and liberals themselves, will cease to exist. The Muslims will kill them all.
I myself was rather hoping to kill the liberalism and convert the liberals back into decent human beings without actually having to kill them. Can't we just beat some sense into these stupid buggers? I think there's still a chance that rushing reality may cure many of their disease before the Muslims severe their heads from their shoulders. Heaven help us.

I do agree with CWYN that liberals do not have a death wish, as Malcolm Muggeride and others believe. Liberals are the biggest pansies and self-worshippers one could ever meet. It is why they are so willing to compromise every day in every way with any enemy, and why most of Christianity today has "be nice and capitulate to every alien at all costs no matter what" as its main ethic, over truth and love of ones own people, even over ones own children.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

"Conspiracy theorists" were spot on

For years, no one listened. Constantly derided as kooks and nuts by the MSM (especially the neo-cons), their concerns were pooh-poohed away as over-reacting. And all the while the disaster kept building. And now One World Government is riding down hard on us: the bankers want to formally centralize all finances, ushering in total global economic control of everyone on the planet.

"Conservative" TV and radio dismissed Ron Paul as an unrealistic kook; they intentionally ran him out of the presidential race, and would not seriously consider anything he said. Such sites as Infowars, Rense, David Duke, Alan Stang, and NewsWithViews were all considered "conspiracy" websites, not respectable or reliable. But now they have proven more correct than the establishment media. America, are you ready to finally read about the truth? Are you finally ready to wake up and see what could be coming next?

The RedTeam cheerleaders in the media are liars and fools. They tell us the crisis is the fault of -- of course -- those Democrats! They were able to predict nothing of the current situation partly because they didn't and don't know what they are talking about, but mostly because they are just paid whores for the establishment media. Just a few weeks ago, Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly, et al. were insisting that the economy was just fine, "don't listen to those lefty scare-mongers!" they shouted. America, get wise: These talking heads are paid to lie to us, to tell us half-truths, to misdirect our attention to secondary issues.

The only people to get it right were Ron Paul and those writers who stuck to the Constitution and criticized fiat money systems. You should be very, very angry. Not only at the international bankers and CEO's, but at their lying RedTeam-BlueTeam prostitutes in the media, both national and local. They should all be tarred and feathered and tied up on the next train to South America.

All you need is love, love, love

Over the years I have watched conservatives lose ground in every important battle they've ever fought, through nothing more than simple compromise and capitulation. They don't want to make waves, you see; for a conservative, being polite is much more important than being right.

James Edwards notes the latest defeat and reproaches the Jew-DayO!-Christians who helped bring it all upon themselves as well as upon the rest of us.
Well, if it’s hate and bigotry to restrict marriage on the basis of race, it’s hate and bigotry to restrict marriage on the basis of gender. You can’t run around for decades praising activist judges for throwing out the historic definition of marriage, invalidating laws based on moral beliefs shared by almost all Americans 50 years ago, and then condemn courts for doing the same thing today.

“Yes, the courts of 50 years ago were right to toss out ancient marriage laws based on the deeply held moral beliefs of nearly 100% of Americans. They were brave, conscientious men who rightly imposed their own views on marriage and invalidated the will of the backward people. But when courts today do the very same thing to us, that’s very wrong.”

That kind of hypocrisy and schizophrenia isn’t much of an argument. It was never going to work. If traditional values folks wanted to keep gay marriage illegal, they should’ve been condemning courts for throwing out the laws that kept interracial marriage illegal.
Amen, Brother.

Albert Mohler pines:
But, far more than this, New England needs the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The moral issues are sufficient alarm -- the deadly danger is the loss of Christian faith.

New England is losing the remnants of its Christian memory. We need a new generation of Christians who, like Jonathan Edwards, will bring the Gospel anew to New England. New England was the cradle of colonial America. Is it now the cradle of America's secular future?
And as lightening follows thunder, I can already see the RedTeam's follow-up comment: "If we could get just one more Justice on the Supreme Court ..."

Something more disturbing, especially to traditional Christians, is that most of Christianity today is now, like Judaism and Islam, the direct enemy of European peoples. Quite a conundrum for young Whites. So what will claim these souls? Islam? Neo-paganism? Reconstructed European polytheism? Traditional Christianity? Buddism? Judaism? Or something else? Wer weiss?

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Freeman Rips Mask Off Israel-Firsters

From Incogman:
History Moved Today: Charles Freeman Rips The Mask Off The Neocon Takeover Of American Government by Israel-Firsters

Charles Freeman, now an American hero, released the statement that is quoted in full below. This statement is one of the most earth-shaking in the history of American government. It marks a watershed. It means that the gloves have come off between whatever remains of the corps of patriots loyal to America in our foreign service and the Israel-firsters who hijacked our government.

What is stunning, and wonderful, about former Ambassador Charles Freeman’s statement is that he squarely lowers the boom on the Neocon Israel-firsters from a position of great POWER. Freeman is on the INSIDE of that power. He just walked out the door with the loudest blast at the Israel-firsters issued from such a high position on the inside in many moons. more >>
From Malooga: Everything you wanted to know about how Zionists control US policy.

Banksters' manipulation of the oil price

Goldman Sachs, the flagship of the international money-changers, pirate firm extraordinaire, has quite a scam going. Excerpts from an article at Phil's Stock World:

$2.5 Trillion - That’s the size of of the global oil scam.

It’s a number so large that, to put it in perspective, we will now begin measuring the damage done to the global economy in "Madoff Units" ($50Bn rip-offs). That’s right - $2.5Tn is 50 TIMES the amount of money that Bernie Madoff scammed from investors in his lifetime, yet it is also LESS than the MONTHLY EXCESS price the global population is being manipulated into paying for a barrel of oil.

Where is the outrage? Where are the investigations?
Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, BP, TOT, Shell, DB and Societe General founded the Intercontinental Exchange in 2000. ICE is an online commodities and futures marketplace. It is outside the US and operates free from the constraints of US laws. The exchange was set up to facilitate "dark pool" trading in the commodities markets. Billions of dollars are being placed on oil futures contracts at the ICE and the beauty of this scam is that they NEVER take delivery, per se. They just ratchet up the price with leveraged speculation using your TARP money. This year alone they ratcheted up the global cost of oil from $40 to $80 per barrel.
...
Over the course of an average month at the NYMEX, 5 BILLION barrels of oil will be traded, with a fee being collected on every single transaction which is ultimately passed down to US consumers, yet less than 40M barrels will actually be delivered. That is just 8 tenths of 1 percent of actual demand for the product that is being traded - 99.2% of the oil transaction fees being paid by the American people do nothing more than create fees for the traders and record profits and bonuses for the trading firms! more >>
The Church Fathers and American Founders tried to warn us about the Talmudic money-changers, but I'll bet even they didn't realize how bad the pillage and destruction could become. And get this: 99% of the American public and their leadership are 100% clueless about how all they get away with all of this, so the thievery will continue until there is literally nothing left for the banksters to steal.

Me miserum. Sometimes I feel like launching into a Max Keiser-style routine.

One-World Religion-ists

A sample of statements about race and ethnicity and tribal and national identity found at OrthodoxInfo.com.

From A Homily from Made Perfect in Faith, by Father James Thornton:
The word "Catholic" also denotes the universality of the Faith of the Church. Ours is not a tribal Church, limited by ethnicity or region. The mission of the Church in this world is limitless; She reaches out to all of mankind.
From Sermon on the Sunday of St. Gregory Palamas
Great Lent, 1998
, by Archbishop Chrysostomos of Etna:
Until this century, because of the influence of the West — the Jesuits in eighteenth-and nineteenth-century Russia and the Lutherans who were appointed as the Ministers of Religion under the first King of Greece, a German Lutheran, placed in power in Greece after its liberation from the Turkish Yoke at the beginning of the nineteenth century —, St. Gregory Palamas was a virtual mystery to Orthodox theologians. This man, whom we hymn as "ho phoster tes Orthodoxias" (the "Enlightener of Orthodoxy") and "to sterigma tes Ekklesias" (the "Pillar of the Church"), taught and lived our Faith in a purity which, except in the hidden confines of monasteries and in the hearts of the simple people—who could not articulate what they knew of Orthodoxy—, was lost to the neo-Papism of Patriarchalism, Western notions of "officialdom," and to nationalism and ethnicity, which are nothing more than a return to heathenism.
From Orthodoxy and Ethnicity, by Franklin Billerbeck:
Remember that Orthodoxy, because it is the fullness of "the faith once delivered" and offered to the entire world, embraces, transforms and makes new all cultures.
...
Precisely because Orthodoxy claims to be catholic (universal), it is at once both the ultimate expression of ones ethnicity and the ultimate rejection of ethnicity. Because ethnicity is absorbed into the faith, the faith becomes the ultimate, God centered, expression of ethnicity. Because the faith ultimately transcends ethnicity and creates a deeper unity than any ethnic bond, the faith is also the ultimate rejection of ethnicity.
From When Is A Chrismation Not A Chrismation?, by Hieromonk Patapios:
Ethnicity is not a determinant of, and certainly does not adequately describe, cognitive styles or modes of thought, and especially in attempts to arrive at consensual theological statements. This kind of assumption can easily court racism, and we must thus avoid it.

An opposing view from Matthew Raphael Johnson, at The Orthodox Medievalist:
This online project is an independent publication of the True Orthodox Church and dedicated to the struggle against the New World Order.

It centers around an interest in the idea of Sobornopravna, combining a dedication to social-nationalism, communitarianism and federalism. This journal stands against ecumenism and globalism, holding that only an ethno-Orthodox traditionalist movement can save the independence of the Orthodox world from the erosive inroads of the state-capitalist empire of the West.

This project seeks to bring all those interested in the ancient Orthodox life together in a shared dedication to the Old Russian and Ukrainian tradition, national independence and ethnic solidarity apart from and opposed to the global economy and its vacuous neo-liberal ideology.
Here we can see two distinct Christian views about the material world. The first is what one today would call the liberal view. It declares that our physical distinctions are unimportant and may be destroyed for the sake of a "oneness" with God. It seeks a universal peace among the human "race."

The second, the conservative view -- for no one is conservative unless he desires to conserve [Latin: conservare, to save, protect, preserve] himself and his heritage -- acknowledges that we are more than spirit only. That we are not merely bodies with spirits nor spirits with bodies, but are one in body and spirit, and that both are important and should be saved from eternal destruction; both should be preserved and nurtured.

Reason and the void left by the Enlightenment

A discussion with Alexander Dugin and Sergei Kapitsa, video part 1, part 2, and part 3.   

Here he discusses two models of sovereignty, that of rule by international corporations and foreign governmental agencies, and rule by a country's own citizens and leaders.

Anyone who would call him conservative must want what Dugin says Russians want.

Dugin discusses the direction of the new Russian Center for Conservative Studies at Moscow State University, and the conservative revolution, here.

Friday, December 2, 2011

World government exposed

Finally, the American people seem to be pulling their heads out of their behinds. Thank God. Even though I knew and said that most people would not realize what's really going on until the wolf is at their door, it has nevertheless been frustrating for me the last 20 years trying to make people understand. Now the whole pack of Jewish bankers and their lackeys is howling and circling, and RedTeam-BlueTeam fanatics are beginning to see that they themselves have been building up the monster all along.



Now, if we can only get the folk away from that mind-destroying Talmud vision and rescue their children from the government indoctrination facilities (a.k.a. public schools), we'd have a real chance at defeating the Marxists.

What Rules The World

by William Ross Wallace
Blessings on the hand of women!
Angels guard its strength and grace,
In the palace, cottage, hovel,
Oh, no matter where the place;

Would that never storms assailed it,
Rainbows ever gently curled;
For the hand that rocks the cradle
Is the hand that rules the world.

more >>
Love you, Mom!

Thursday, December 1, 2011

The BlueTeam and the RedTeam

From Roman Sports and Spectacles, by Anne Mahoney:
Yet Roman chariot racing came as close to anything in the ancient world to the team sports we know today. Each chariot belonged to one of four "factions" or colors, called Blue, Green, Red, and White. ... Spectators were loyal to their colors, and might identify themselves as Blues or Greens depending on what team they rooted for. Literary sources tell us the Romans often seemed to care more about the color or team than about the merits of the individual drivers. But whereas teams in modern American sports generally represent a city or a school, the four chariot factions never stood for anything other than themselves.
Oh, but what a spectacle.