Time for real change

John Schwenkler writes about the growing movement for secession. I agree, it's time for real change. The liberals and conservatives in "the liberal generation" have pushed us to a point where we have no choice. Our government was big and out of control many decades ago and would've been considered a disaster by early Americans' standards. Today it is much, much bigger and more powerful. Our ancestors would probably, maybe rightly so, consider it The Beast.

Schwenkler has a huge blind spot, though. He strongly condemns those "racists," not realizing that this position is a communistic, universal, radical-liberal one. He throws the term around, I suspect, to be polite and non-extreme, trying to get as much support as possible. But it's clear that he would condemn any efforts of nations to segregate themselves based on their deepest identity, their race. CWNY puts his finger on it:

So white Europeans who are still European are dragged before the bar of Liberaldom and found to be guilty of racism, which is the liberals’ word for treason. But at the same time, the liberals assert that there really is no difference between the white and the black. “We are all God’s children.” Whoops, the liberal can’t say that, so he backtracks: “We are all part of the brotherhood of man. But wait – the white man is not part of the brotherhood of man; he is an evil ...” It gets hard for the liberal. All those contradictions give him a headache.

People like John will lead no serious revolt because they have bought into the liberals' lie and lead themselves around in circles. But I'm glad of him raising the subject of secession.

Here is a link to the American Secessionist Project. Although it seems out of date, it has collected some good links.

For all their fecklessnes and love of liberalism, our elders did at least teach (some of) us to honor our forefathers. And that is exactly what we are going to do.

If you want to begin your own little secessionist movement, start homeschooling now. Either teach your own children or, if yours are already grown, teach your grandchildren and the neighborhood children. Pick a subject you like, become knowledgeable in it, and start teaching. You know you should, so start now, today. This is your chance to make a real difference. Take it.

The Eternal Revolution

an exerpt from Orthodoxy, by G.K. Chesterton:

We have not any need to rebel against antiquity; we have to rebel against novelty. It is the new rulers, the capitalist or the editor, who really hold up the modern world. ... It will not be necessary for any one to fight again against the proposal of a censorship of the press. We do not need a censorship of the press. We have a censorship by the press.

This startling swiftness with which popular systems turn oppressive is the third fact for which we shall ask our perfect theory of progress to allow. It must always be on the look out for every privilege being abused, for every working right becoming a wrong. In this matter I am entirely on the side of the revolutionists. They are really right to be always suspecting human institutions; they are right not to put their trust in princes nor in any child of man. The chieftain chosen to be the friend of the people becomes the enemy of the people; the newspaper started to tell the truth now exists to prevent the truth being told. Here, I say, I felt that I was really at last on the side of the revolutionary. And then I caught my breath again: for I remembered that I was once again on the side of the orthodox.

Christianity spoke again and said: “I have always maintained that men were naturally backsliders; that human virtue tended of its own nature to rust or to rot; I have always said that human beings as such go wrong, especially happy human beings, especially proud and prosperous human beings. This eternal revolution, this suspicion sustained through centuries, you (being a vague modern) call the doctrine of progress. If you were a philosopher you would call it, as I do, the doctrine of original sin. You may call it the cosmic advance as much as you like; I call it what it is—the Fall.”

Rant of Youth: Hey, Geezers!

Your day is coming.

You blindly followed Clinton and Bush and their neo-con advisors. You promoted big government at every turn, in the name of "liberalism" or "conservatism." You are even now led around by the nose by neo-con liars on the radio and "conservative" stink tanks like the Heritage Foundation and Cato Institute. You hide behind black doofuses as your party's leaders and spokesmen in a moronic, feckless attempt to avoid being called names by the Marxists and their useful idiots.

You have been extremely liberal and tolerant. In the 1960's you turned decidedly commie and put the Tribe in control. Now we are going to be a minority in our own country in a few years, all the racial laws are stacked against us, and the government is busily building a new Soviet Union all around us.

All their lives, you ignored your children. You sent them to government schools, not knowing or even caring that they were being indoctrinated into Marxism and all manner of perversions; you simply couldn't be bothered. Most of you still couldn't care less. Daily you watch and let your children watch degraded filth on TV and the Internet, and you waste your time playing video games, golfing, and gambling.

You have spent all of my money and my children's money and my grandchildren's money on your stupid Jew-DayO!-Christian/liberal/Marxist save-the-world campaigns and selfish feel-good projects. You squandered an undreamed of amount of wealth and prosperity on yourselves, with your extended vacations, fancy cars and gadgets, funded in large part by government largess and government-funded retirement benefits.

Well, it's all coming to an end very soon. I hope you're happy. You didn't have time for your children and now they are not going to have time for you because they will be laboring under the most massive debt in history, and under one of the most tyrannical governments in the modern world -- because you still don't care enough to get off your smelly old rumps and do anything. You refuse to even discuss it. You deny your culpability and chatter on about "those Democrats/Republicans/Islamist-terrorists!" You are more than ready to hand the problems you created on to my and my children's generations. In fact, you just that long, long ago.

You'd better pick out your retirement home now -- there's going to be a shortage of cardboard refrigerator boxes soon (thanks to your passionate embrace of global Capitalism/Marxism, our manufacturing was sent overseas), too.

Are we angry? No, of course not. Here, drink your government medicine ...

First they came for the communists

While reading the Lew Rockwell blog, I came across this famous quotation in a post from David Kramer concerning Elie Wiesel's demand that Holyhoax "deniers" be thrown into prison:

“First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me.”

—Pastor Martin Niemöller

Great quotation. The lesson here is that if you didn't want be arrested, then you shouldn't have been a communist or communist sympathizer. Another is that the Nazis were dead serious about removing all traitorous, Marxist scum from their country in order to protect their own nation from international exploitation.

Axe falls on St George:

England’s biggest St George’s Day parade is facing the axe after councillors said many of those attending it were racist. Just another proof that those in power, the leaders of Marxism/multiculturalism and open borders in the Western world, continue their advance at outlawing all Europeans. It is genocide by degrees.

How to compost

With TEOTWAWKI (the end of the world as we know it) barrelling down on us (well, maybe :-), you'll probably want to get yourself a new hoe. And you'll be wanting to change out the political compost you've been drowning in for a much healthier kind.

Compost is cheap (practically free) and easy to make. It reduces landfill costs and space. Best of all, there is nothing better you can add to your yard and garden to keep it healthy and productive. You can eliminate or severely reduce the need for fertilizers and pesticides in those areas that have a few inches of compost added to them every year, leaving your wallet and your environment healthier and more balanced than ever.

Here is the basic recipe:
Mix equal weights of leaves and grass (~3:1 by volume). Keep the mixture moist and turn it every few weeks until it turns black. Spread liberally over your yard, around your trees, and in your garden and flowerbeds. That's it.

Details and advice:
Collect the leaves in the fall and winter and then mix them with grass cuttings in the spring and summer, about 3 parts leaves to 1 part grass. Pile them separately, then mix them together using a leaf rake, raking the mixture into your compost pile as you go. You could then put the mixture into bins in order to save space if you like, but I just pile it all into one big, steaming heap right on the ground.

The whole process is simple and it does not smell bad if you mix it properly. Mix the grass soon after it's cut -- grass that sits out in the summer heat for more than a day or two really reeks.

OK to add to the composting mixure:
* Kitchen scraps
* Wood chips
* Brown shredded paper
* Rabbit, horse, and cow manure are OK to add if you like, but you'll need to compost a few weeks longer in order to remove some of the acidity if your soil is already too acidic.

Do not add:
* Dairy, meat, or bones. These decay too slowly and smell bad in large quantities.
* No dirt or "compost starter" are needed.
* No sticks or limbs. They decay too slowly and make your pile difficult to turn.
* Absolutely no dog or cat waste (yuk!).

Basically, if you just stick to mixing up leaves and grass, and turning it once every few weeks, you'll have perfect compost in no time, anywhere from 2-4 months.

Visions of Order

The book from Richard M. Weaver. A good read, or re-read, as the case may be.

In the name of Free Trade and the Economy

Over the last several hundred years Geld über Alles has become the West's highest ordering principle. We hear little else argued seriously in the politics of conservatives and liberals; from the RedTeam, BlueTeam, or PinkTeam (libertarians). And what has our god of greed done for us? Clearly, as many have been warning for years, Mammon has given to us nothing but unbelievable, grotesque corruption and bankruptcy to replace white society, family, nations, and civilization. Read, Demand Congress Stop Withholding Taxes Now, by Devvy Kidd, for more.

An income tax moratorium. A good idea to be sure, but with so many going broke it would probably be a moot point by the time the District of Criminals got around to passing such a law. And, because I strongly suspect Devvy already knows that, I believe her call for said law may be a clever way to have us send a warning to the banksters and their Heime-licking allies that we will soon be in a non-tax-paying mode, new law or no new law.

The dollar bubble and the overthrow of the banksters

Video on YouTube, a summary of the current economic situation.

The overthrow of the international money-changers could be beginning now.

Misc. Updates

Zsidosas and Waylanders Keep have a few interesting updates on the neverending efforts to slow the crime wave.

The National Socialist stand on Christianity

At the Scriptorium. Not an Early American stance to be sure, but not at all the antagonistic one that Hollywood has led us to believe. From the article:

The irrevocable truth is that religious life in Germany, under the protection of the National Socialist state, unfolds more freely and undisturbed. No form of Godlessness or blasphemy is tolerated and the churches as well as their religious affairs are secure, undisturbed, and free of problems in a way that is unprecedented in history and almost unknown in any other country on earth.

Not that I am for National Socialism, and I'm sure that there is more than a little party platform promotion going on here. But I do find it interesting to see facts about history that are in such contrast to what the Marxists in Hollywood, academia, and the government have always told us.

Get out of debt

The U.S. should do what Andrew Jackson did, what Germany tried to do, and what Russia did : break free from the death grip of the money-changers and regain our sovereignty. Ever-growing debt is not a solution to our problems but one of the primary causes of them.

Bernanke: No quick recovery

Fed chairman says policymakers now have 'tools' to fix financial crisis but that economy will take time to rebound.

Bernanke warned that even with all the moves made by the Fed and Treasury, "credit markets will take some time to unfreeze." He also said the housing crisis will continue to be a drag on the economy but he also said that "the problem was much broader than subprime lending."

In other words, "The surge is working." Bernake also said, "Woob, woob, woob, woob!"

Get the full load of horse apples here.

Two party tyranny

The Chairman of the Constitution Party reports:

... After over a decade of neglect that I have personally witnessed, it is clear that neither state or local officials want to do anything about the problem.

You may also want to mention [in your letter] that the Elections Division “lost” the timely filing for Chuck Baldwin and would have excluded him from the ballot if we did not have proof they received the filing. On the other hand, they accepted the filing of McCain and Obama even though they did not file by the deadline. Bob Barr brought suit to keep them off the ballot in Texas but biased Texas judges allowed them to remain on the ballot.

You get the picture – when the major parties violate the law, it’s no big deal. When challengers to their power fail to comply with even the smallest detail of the law, they are in violation. Such a double standard is unacceptable in a just and lawful society.

An appropriate phrase is:

a) Sic semper tyrannis.
b) In melle sunt linguae sitae vostrae atque orationes, facta atque corda in felle sunt sita atque acerbo aceto. -- Plautus
c) Delendus est Marxismus.
d) Justum ab injustis petere insipienta est. -- Plautus
e) Omnes.

Answer to yesterday's Latin quiz: d) Ullum.

Success and its poisonous flower of democracy

Paradoxically to most people, it is the struggle and the individual's attitude to it that maintain freedom and build success. It is the worship of that same success and love of safety that bring about rot and failure. Standards are relaxed; systems grow of their own volition; the foreign, the incompetent, and the insane are allowed to immigrate, integrate, vote, and to rule; The Mob subsequently takes over, bringing about collapse.

Tim Case, in Preamble to Social Mayhem, sees the Destructor (my term) as the State and all its opera which kills initiative and freedom:

Certainly no serious student of history would dare ignore any of these lines of reasoning in studying the fall of the Roman Empire. However, there is one further item that is rarely addressed but which should be of equal importance to understanding why great empires, like Rome, ultimately fail.

Whether we are talking about an autocracy, oligarchy, or democracy we are in the final analysis dealing with a coercive force which will become violent to attain its ends. As the state increases its power base and the demands upon its citizens, it will seek to have a domineering effect upon the human spirit. The result is the destruction of self-reliance, self-determination and self-confidence of free citizens and replacing them with a dutiful, subservient drone totally reliant on the state.

The pressure the state exerts on it subjects was not lost on Tacitus who bemoaned the servile mood of the Roman Senate under Tiberius in contrast to the character of the Senate during the building of the Empire. Even Tiberius is reported to have said in disgust of the Roman senators: "O men, ready for slavery!"

Three of the great writers of antiquity – Livy, Pliny the elder, and Tacitus – all recognized that the Roman society was becoming enslaved. Livy felt it was because of the wealth and Pliny concurred that the lack of intellectual interests was the result of the worship of wealth.

Tacitus, however, stated that "genius died by the same blow that ended public liberty" laying the blame directly at the feet of the rising tyranny of the Roman state.

However, it is the unknown philosopher of Longinus’ On The Sublime who pinpoints the cause when he says:

... we of to-day seem to have learnt in our childhood the lessons of a benignant despotism, to have been cradled in her habits and customs from the time when our minds were still tender, and never to have tasted the fairest and most fruitful fountain of eloquence, I mean liberty. Hence we develop nothing but a fine genius for flattery. [Lewis Lapham wrote some excellent commentary and advice about this. -- r.m.] This is the reason why, though all other faculties are consistent with the servile condition, no slave ever became an orator; because in him there is a dumb spirit which will not be kept down: his soul is chained: he is like one who has learnt to be ever expecting a blow. For, as Homer says – ‘the day of slavery takes half our manly worth away.’

In Catiline's War Gaius Sallustius Crispus opens his dissertation with this statement:

Every man who is anxious to surpass the lower animals should strive with all his power not to pass his life in obscurity like the brute beasts, which nature has made the groveling slaves of their bellies. Now our whole ability resides jointly in our mind and body. In the case of the mind it is its power of guidance, in the case of the body its obedient service that we rather use, sharing the former faculty with the gods, the latter with the brute creation.

[This excellent passage was adapted as a Latin reading exercise by Anne H. Groton and James M. May --r.m.]

We may say then, without too much contradiction, that the real war between a free people and the state resides over who will control the mind: the individual or the state.

If it is the individual, society will continue to grow and flourish, while if the state wins control, the society rapidly decays, allowing the points often citied for the fall of the Roman Empire to occur.

Alexis de Tocqueville, in Democracy in America, describes the bureaucratic creep that brings Case's Destructor State which kills initiative and freedom:

Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications, and to watch over their fate. That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild. It would be like the authority of a parent, if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks, on the contrary, to keep them in perpetual childhood: It is well content that the people should rejoice, provided they think of nothing but rejoicing.
...
For their happiness such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness; it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances: what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living?
...
Thus, it every day renders the exercise of the free agency of man less useful and less frequent: it circumscribes the will within a narrower range and gradually robs a man of all the uses of himself. The principle of equality has prepared men for these things; it has predisposed men to endure them, and oftentimes to look on them as benefits.
...
After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp, and fashioned him at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd.
...
The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting: such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to be nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd.

Nota bene that there is no call here for change for change's sake, as the Marxists and other statist communists desire.

In Schism and Conscience: Solzhenitsyn’s First Circle and Cancer Ward, Matthew Raphael Johnson writes:

The Enlightenment is based on the interconnection of all external stimuli (since they are all reducible to atoms and their vibrations), hence, totalitarianism is a practical and scientific necessity. If force applied in one direction will eventually affect all elements, then everything is connected. This is graphically shown in the beginning of the novel when the vibrations of Volodin’s voice create a chain reaction of activation of the NKVD’s entire apparatus in an inorganic dystopic anti-nature. All is motion, all is cause and effect, hence all is connected, hence there is no autonomous element of life. This is the main thesis of the work as related to the USSR and all materialist visions, its negation is the basis of the dialogue between Rubin and Nerzhnin. The Enlightenment, as a result, must become the totalitarian state: Marx/Lenin are the proper successor to Bacon, Compte, Darwin and Huxley.

4. Nerzhnin is a humanist in the best sense of that word. He is not motivated by ideology or any externalized sense of identity. If Rubin is Huxley, then Nerzhnin is Tolstoy: questioning, suffering, searching, but always cheerful, for this is the proper state of man, a man striving to understand. This impulse is snuffed out by ideology, or the full identification of society with a historical idea, in that all ideologies claim to be the “end of history.”

Every man-made system for beating the forces of the Universe ultimately fails. They fail because man is not a machine or a creature of instinct. He is a being of free will and will eventually choose to ignore or override every system he creates. "The Beast," in my estimation, is not a man or machine or even a particular system or ideology; it is our dependence on system which destroys us.

Republicrats rise to Dempublican challenge

The election of a Black Liberation Theology president has prompted Republicans, no doubt led by the RNC neo-con leadership, to bravely present a clear alternative: another African. Another anti-White gun-grabber, no less.

This is a proud day for Original Americans and Europeans everywhere, one that has been promised by American patriots, the Klan and the Nazis for years. RedTeam leadership is pleased as punch:

Blackwell's campaign had been endorsed by conservative leaders like Family Research Council President Tony Perkins and Phyllis Schlafly of the Eagle Forum, but it never caught fire among the 168 RNC members voting on the chairmanship.
...
Former Ohio GOP Chairman Bob Bennett of Cleveland, an RNC member, said Steele's selection will "take the party in a new direction." He said Blackwell's endorsement of Steele threw conservative votes to Steele that were critical to his eventual victory.

"You have a great spokesman for the party," Bennett said of Steele. "You have an outstanding leader. I think that it will certainly benefit the party as we move forward."

Ohio GOP Chairman Kevin DeWine of Fairborn said many of his RNC colleagues were looking for the candidate with the best plan to "rebuild and redo" the party.

"I think that there is a hunger for change on this committee just as there is a hunger for change at the grassroots level of Republican politics throughout this country," said DeWine.

The RedTeam pews are filled with the Holy Spirit. Lucianne.com:

I, for one, am thrilled. I have been listening to Steele for several years and he is very articulate and funny. It's a miracle to get such a talented leader at this time, plus, the dems can't call the Repubs "the party of old white men" any more. I have a good feeling about this!

And:

I am so happy with Michael Steele being the Chairman of the RNP...finally, a man of honor with a spine who will do his job and very well...bi-partisanship be dammed...misspelled so I don't get banned from site. May the Lord keep and help Michael Steele safe from the Liberal Swindlers.

Ken Blackwell, approvingly quoted by the Eagle Forum, says:

History has proven conservative ideas win. Republican leaders must explain how conservative principles - expressed through bold policies - will improve people’s lives. Show voters how conservative ideas will help them enjoy more freedom, security and a brighter future, and they will vote Republican. The GOP needs a chairman with the ability to project that message.

Marxism and the destruction of European leadership in a European country is conservative? No, but it is Jew-Day-O!-Christian, very progressive.

A RedTeam fan close to me opined, "This is really very good for Republicans because now we won't have to listen to how we are oppressing Blacks anymore." Yes, I'm sure the cries for equality will end any day now. And the anti-White prayer at the recent Presidential inauguration will be retracted, and Rangel and Reich will apologize for colluding against European working men. Hold your breath, Brainiacs.

Better yet, Republicans now have a chance to continue Bush's -- their worshipful master -- great work: the hyper-growth of government, continued massive third-world immigration, the police state, the war on terrace, the growth of UNESCO's No Child Left Behind and other Marxist indoctrination programs, more legal preferences for non-Whites, more anti-White "hate crimes" legislation, ad nauseum.

Yessirree, Corndog, a clear victory for Conservatism. Damn fine, you betcha.

Incumbent RNC chair Mike Duncan conceded, "the winds of change are blowing." James Edwards has been saying something similar. He calls it, The rise of ethnopolitics.

----

Related article from White Reference about David Duke's reaction to the RNC's new "magic negro."

Bush's family values booming in Phoenix

where it is now the "kidnap for ransom" capital of the United States. Sam Quinones tells us:

Arizona has become the new drug gateway into the United States. Roughly half of all marijuana seized along the U.S.-Mexico border was taken on the state's 370-mile border with Mexico.

One result is an epidemic of kidnapping that many residents are barely aware of. Indeed, most every other crime here is down. But police received 366 kidnapping-for-ransom reports last year, and 359 in 2007. Police estimate twice that number go unreported. ...

Ransom kidnapping is a rare crime in America. Most cops go their entire careers without handling one. These days, most kidnappings involve a husband taking a child from an estranged wife. That's how things were in Phoenix until a few years ago. more >>

Good job, Jorge Bush! And thanks a million to all your GloboCapitalist/Marxist supporters, mostly neo-con Jews and Jew-DayO!-Christians. Not only will Euros be a minority in the U.S. within our lifetime but now we also have the neo-con promise of living in third world squalor and being led by degenerates and other foreigners for the rest of our lives.

A cultural difference of opinion about tipping

This girl is hilarious. She demonstrates how to treat those who serve. The incident she describes is an example in miniature of what she would do if she were in authority over others, and shows her process of rationalization. I appreciate her candor, very instructive. Viewer discretion is advised: Bad language throughout and a revolting image at the end.


Her recitation, summary, and interpretation of the relevant legal codes of her case begin at 3:08.

Land of the free

Our neo-con/oligarch/Marxist/"God's Chosen People" are deadly serious about the new police state they are building. Check out these weapons they intend to use on U.S. citizens. Notice they've already field tested some of these on their enemies in the U.S. and in the Middle East. They liked the results so much they are improving them for use here on Americans (that means you, too, RedTeam and BlueTeam fans).

Come on, Sean Hannity listeners, sing with me, "And I'm proud to be an American, where at least I know I'm free ..." dum de dum dum ... Now chant with me, "We gotta fight domestic terrorism!"

I'd like to also point out here that we are witnessing another result of decoupling science from tradition and religion. In our eagerness to create neat new weapons because we can, we have forgotten to ask if we should.

But never fear, Comrades. The good news is that we can sell these new toys to our enemies and make a few bucks to cover the trillions stolen from us by the banksters/oligarchs.

Holocaust "denial"

What Does Holocaust Denial Really Mean?, by Daniel McGowan, February 2009.

BNP Updates Language & Concepts Discipline Manual

A model for real Americans. This is what our leaders should be doing. From the Chelmsford Anglican Mainstream:

Politics requires propaganda, and effective propaganda requires self-discipline. It is essential that all official (and preferably unofficial, i.e. public comments by party members) BNP communications stick to the party’s true message and convey it to the voting public in a clear and consistent way.

The enemy wants us to be misunderstood — this is why they deliberately lie to the public about what we stand for — so we must do everything possible to make it impossible for the public to misunderstand us.

Therefore, BNP Policy Research has compiled the following rules of language and concepts discipline:

Rule #1: The BNP is not a ‘racist’ or ‘racial’ party. It should never be referred to as such by BNP activists, and anyone else who does so must be politely but firmly corrected. The precisely correct description of what we are, in the standard terminology of international comparative politics, is a ‘patriotic’ or ‘ethno-nationalist’ party. That is, we espouse, like many political parties all over the world, the interests of the particular ethnic groups to which we belong. If you are accused of being a ‘racist’ then do not try and get into a definition of what is meant by that. The answer is simply “no, the BNP is not racist” and that is all. Do not fall into the media trap of trying to debate what racism is — as soon as you hedge the question, you are giving them an opportunity to exploit. See the 2008 booklet Folk and Nation: Underpinning the Ethnostate for more details.

Rule #2: Do not hesitate to repudiate bad aspects of the BNP’s past. Point out that all parties have some people who have said and done silly things. The important issue upon which to focus is what is being said and done now. People can and do change, and this has happened to the BNP as well. There is no comparison between the BNP of ten or fifteen years ago, in the same way that there is no comparison between the Labour or Conservative Parties of now and twenty years ago. All parties evolve, mature, and change, and we do not have to be on the defensive for things said and done twenty years ago which have no relevance to the modern BNP.

Rule #3: The BNP’s core principle is one of Britain and British people first, and we do not hesitate to announce this from all public platforms. This is not an extreme position — in fact it is one which any normal country would have. If you are questioned on this, and there might be some people mad enough to call it into question, point out that the Japanese government always acts in the interests of the people of Japan etc., and that almost all nations in the world act in the interests of their own people first. This does not mean that the Japanese “hate” anybody else, merely that they have the good sense to put their own interests first. In this way, the BNP makes no secret of the fact that it seeks to put British people and British interests first, and this includes putting measures in place to ensure that the majority population of this nation remains ethnically British. This is not a policy to hide — on the contrary, it is one to discuss openly, as it differentiates the BNP from all the other political parties who seek the exact opposite.

Rule #4: The BNP campaigns in a totally lawful manner. Our experience has shown time and time again that agent provocateurs who suggest nonparliamentary means of political activity are most often extreme left infiltrators who seek to create situations wherein the media can portray the BNP in a bad light. Any member hearing any such language or suggestions must immediately report it to their party senior who must then pass the information upwards, never outwards, so that it can be dealt with as quickly as possible.

Rule #5: Always remember that the BNP’s policies are basic common sense, and mainstream. Repeated opinion polls show that on our core issues, the majority of the public agree with us and the extremists are the establishment politicians. Do not let interviewers or opponents get away with using the words ‘extreme’ or ‘far right’ or such terms. Challenge such statements immediately by asking what is so ‘extreme’ about any of them. The interviewer or opponent will quickly be put on the spot to justify his position, and will be hard-pressed to show that a policy (such as) “Britain for the British” is extreme. (You can point out that everyone agrees Tibet should be for the Tibetans, and that is not regarded as ‘extreme’.)

Rule #6: The BNP is not ‘anti-European’. We are ‘anti-EU’ or ‘anti-European Union’ or ‘anti-Brussels’. Do not criticise Europe per se — only the institution of the EU, which is a liberal/fascist monstrosity designed to destroy national borders, identities and cultures, and which poses the greatest threat to the continued existence of individual nations since the end of the Communist empire.

Rule#7: The BNP is not ‘anti-Polish’ or ‘anti-Eastern European’. The Eastern European nations have the right to protect their own workforce — in exactly the same way that Britain does. If you are in a discussion about Polish or Eastern European workers, do not end an argument by saying “how terrible it all is” but point out that Poles would object if a million British, or a million Vietnamese descended on Poland and took away jobs from Polish people by working for less than the living wage in that country. There is nothing wrong with such a policy position, and all intelligent people will understand this — Poles and other Eastern Europeans included. Finally, point out that it is the EU “Freedom of Movement” rules, introduced by the Tories, which are ultimately responsible for recent demographic changes, and not the people themselves.

Rule #8: When addressing a specific audience, arguments for our policies should always be couched in language calculated to be relevant to their interests. Do not bore a workingmen’s audience with those parts of our ideology that derive from old-school Toryism, or puzzle an affluent suburban audience with an explanation of worker ownership of industry.

Rule #9: Racial and ethnic epithets and insults should never be used. Leave the crude ethnic jokes about Chinese cockle pickers to the Tories and others. The BNP is under special media scrutiny for any such language, and it is strictly forbidden, no matter how light-hearted it may be.

Rule #10: A political party cannot succeed, or even attract new members, if it takes as its premise the hopelessness of its cause. Therefore, BNP activists and writers must, though they should strongly condemn the rotten character of the present British regime and the society it has produced, never speak of the situation in Britain as hopeless or of British society as corrupt to the point of worthlessness. They must always remember that politics, at the end of the day, is an act of will, and our creative vision of what Britain ought to be must always be alive in our hearts and projected with confidence to the public.

Rule #11: Explanations of our ideology should be couched, whenever possible, in terms of specifically British history and the specific national identity of Britain. For example, when discussing rights, we should speak of ‘our traditional rights’ or ‘the rights of Englishmen’, not about universal human rights, which is a very different concept.

Rule #12: Successful revolutions from the right have always presented themselves as restoring older traditions. Therefore, we should couch our agenda in restorationist terms whenever possible. Ours is a populist traditionalism, not an elitist one.

Rule #13: The BNP defines British people in both civic and ethnic terms. Immigrants, and descendants of immigrants who have settled here from non-European countries, are British in the fullest civic sense of the word, and entitled to the rights of all British subjects. This includes all rights and duties (such as full protection under the law) and all other aspects of participatory society, such as national sports teams, military service, civic associations and the like.

The BNP also defines British people in an ethnic sense, in that we are the descendants of the traditional peoples of England, Scotland, Wales and the island of Ireland. In the same way, an English person might be born in China of English parents and might have a Chinese passport, but would never be ethnically described as Chinese.

This ethnic understanding of Britishness does not impinge upon the civic rights of British passport holders. It is merely an expression of the rights of an indigenous people to be recognised as such, and to have the right to remain as the majority population in their own nation.

This right is accepted as normal by almost every other nation on earth, who also define their indigenous populations ethnically. Pakistan, for example, has a law of return which guarantees children of Pakistani immigrants the right to a Pakistani passport, no matter where in the world they may have been born.

Sign me up, Scottie. PDF version here. Pass it around.

The house that "conservatives" built

We have the RedTeam to thank for this new KGB-type monstrosity. When their fearless leader, G.W. Bush, and his Jews were whipping up the ridiculous "war on terror" frenzy in the media and in D.C., it was us "Ron Paul Constitutional Kooks," as Sean Hannity put it, whom they spit on and called traitors. I wonder what these RedTeam patriotards think now, as they discover that they are the terrorists the politicians had in mind all along.

George Washington warned us in his farewell speech about succumbing to party politics. This is a good example of why. The RedTeam gave powers to the Executive that they would never have dreamed of giving up had the BlueTeam been in power. And now it seems too late to take them back.

Related: I highly recommend you watch the movie Katyn, if you want to see a little slice of how the Chosen Ones run things. And for yet more insight into what is coming at you very soon, read The Little Black Book of Communism, Stalin's Willing Executioners, or The Gulag Archipelago.

Winnie The Pooh in Latin

I came across this description tonight at Amazon while surfing for Latin:

The enchanting tales of Pooh and his friends were first brought to readers in classic Latin form in 1960 with the publication of Winnie Ille Pu. It remains the only book in Latin ever to grace The New York Times List. Now Winnie Ille Pu Semper Ludet is available as a companion volume. Perfect for the novice as well as the Latin scholar, Brian Staples' translation proves once again that Latin is not a dead language. And Pooh, as everyone knows, will live forever.

Yes, perfect for the novice who wants to spend $15 well before it's time. Popular books translated into Latin such as the Grinch and Winnie the Pooh are way past a beginner's ability. This is because in order to ensure a faithful translation the translator must use every form of Latin he can, even the idiomatic and complicated.

My advice for the novice is to stick to the simple stuff and take it in order. Latin is very difficult; do it right, take your time. I recommend a beginner's course such as Karen Moh's Latin's Not So Tough, Ben L. D'Ooge's Latin for Beginners, then Latin composition, and then easy Latin readers.

Bonam Fortunam, Amice.

Tom Tancredo and the bobos

Gratias ago to Tom for writing this article, wherein he complains about the SPLC and their smear tactics. However, after explaining what a bunch of scum the organization is and giving a few examples of how they lie like their father, he writes the following:

Why a group that aligns itself with terrorists, but opposes The Lord of the Rings is taken seriously by anyone is beyond me.

Really? Is that possible? Can one be at Tom's level and not know which tribe runs the SPLC, the media, academia, and the District of Criminals, especially the NKVD/KGB/Dept of Homeland Security?  I seriously doubt it.  I believe he does know but also knows what will happen to him if he boldly proclaims the truth and is protecting himself accordingly.

There is a simple rule: To quickly discover who is in charge, ask whom you are not allowed to criticize. A corollary:  If you are not allowed to critize anyone, you know right away who is the slave.

What I believe Tom doesn't see is that absolutely none of our current leadership will acknowledge what is becoming more obvious to ever more regular folk, which is that Europeans have been almost completely displaced in positions of power in their own countries and are fast becoming -- thanks to the bobos -- a powerless minority at every other level of government and society. 

In other words, Western countries have been almost completely taken over by a hostile enemy tribe and our leaders are afraid to even acknowledge the fact.  Euros are without any leadership whatever, unable to fight back or even express their frustration.  They are being rapidly dispossed of their legal rights, their social status, their wealth, their health, and ability to make a living and support and protect their families.  Judging by gold, silver, gun, ammunition, survival gear sales, and the recent tea party protests, they're becoming a little pipped.

And yet the bobos just keep pushing.  They propose ever more domestic government spying, wars for Israel, more Marxism/multiculturalism/Globocapitalism, endless taxation, and are still working to officially outlaw what free speech remains.  What outcome do these power-mad, self-chosenites expect?  Has not their Holyhoax myth taught them anything?

Want to stick it to the banks? Join a credit union

In the "I know it's bad but what can I do?" department, some advice from dlindorff at This Can't Be Happening.