Rick Warren and the Obamanation

James Edwards writes:

Rick Warren is growing. Obama announced the other day that Gene Robinson, the openly homosexual Episcopal bishop whose selection has torn that church apart, will be praying at another inaugural event. Rick Warren thinks that’s just terrific:

Today, Warren issued a statement praising Obama for selecting Robinson, saying the president-elect “has again demonstrated his genuine commitment to bringing all Americans of goodwill together in search of common ground. I applaud his desire to be the president of every citizen.”

It was only a few years ago that Christians regarded homosexuality as sick perversion and an abomination to God. Now the nation’s most influential evangelical pastor is celebrating the fact that a homosexual minister will be praying at the inauguration of a new president. more >>

Best web post in a long time

Beyond the Cruel Thorns, at CWYN.

What is an aristocratic soul to do?

From Laudator Temporis Acti:

The Eagle and the Mole, Elinor Wylie

Avoid the reeking herd,
Shun the polluted flock,
Live like that stoic bird,
The eagle of the rock.

The huddled warmth of crowds
Begets and fosters hate;
He keeps, above the clouds,
His cliff inviolate.

When flocks are folded warm,
And herds to shelter run,
He sails above the storm,
He stares into the sun.

If in the eagle's track
Your sinews cannot leap,
Avoid the lathered pack,
Turn from the steaming sheep.

If you would keep your soul
From spotted sight or sound,
Live like the velvet mole;
Go burrow underground.

And there hold intercourse
With roots of trees and stones,
With rivers at their source,
And disembodied bones.

The Question:

Ah, what am I to do? Where must I go to escape misfortune? Soar to high heaven or sink beneath the earth?
οἴμοι, τί δράσω; ποῖ κακῶν ἐρημίαν εὕρω, πτερωτὸς ἢ κατὰ χθονὸς μολών;

Well, that's one way to do it. You could also turn off your TV and radio, stop gaming so much, homeschool your children, read Shakespeare, Cicero, et al., learn to fish and hunt, learn to build and repair your own house, car, and machinery.

Western Civilization's war on Christian Serbia

(For those who don't know, the Serbian nation is largely southern European white and Christian. The United States -- supposedly a Christian nation -- has under Clinton and Bush been the supporter of all manner of atrocities by the Muslim Albanians against the Christian Serbs. Recently, the U.S. supported the Albanian land-grab of Kosovo from the Serbs. The U.S. took this highly illegal and immoral position mostly in order to aggravate Serbia's ally Russia, which is continuing its return to its ethnic Christian faith, and is continuing its purge of Marxist and Trotskyist (neo-con, "Russian oligarch") Jews.)

From the Orthodox Medievalist, Michael Raphael Johnson:

Serbia’s reputation throughout the 20th century has ranged from the “brave little Serbia” of World War I to the “axis of evil” at the dawn of the 21st century. Today, Serbia is the most lied about country on the globe, where non-existent massacres are commemorated by world leaders and the country is policed by foreign troops. Today, Bosnia is a direct protectorate of the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). It is ruled directly by western capitalists and exploiters. Albanians burn and rape at will in Kosovo, under the nose of the already illegitimate KFOR troops. Bought and paid for political whores such as Rep. Chris Smith of New Jersey and Senator Joseph Biden of Delaware support the rampages of the Islamic terrorists in Bosnia, who have been funded and trained by the United States, which is certainly a novel interpretation of the phony “war on terror.”

Regardless, Serbia is facing a future of poverty, degradation and international slander. The recent electoral victories of the Radical Party were simply nullified by the occupation troops in the name of “democracy,” believe it or not. It was common to read western headlines that read: “Radical Party Wins Election: Democracy Endangered.” To call this Orwellian is to be too cliche. It has gone far beyond that.
...
Serious scholars of the region known one thing: the entire Serb mentality was forged in resistance. Under the vicious rule of the Turk, Serbia was left with a handful of dirt poor farmers and few churches. Who was left in Serbia proper was forced to celebrate his slava and read the scriptures for his sustenance. In the words of St. Nikolaij, his home “became a little monastery.” For Serbs, Christianity is a family affair, and the suffering under the Turk forged this. The slava is all he had left. On cannot understand that institution without understanding its role under the Turks. The Serbs are ethnic nationalists in their Orthodoxy because, primarily, that is how Orthodoxy was forged in the Slavic world, but more importantly, because it was because of these structures of survival that Orthodoxy survived at all.
...
Of course, Orthodoxy is ethnic. Among the Slavs, the brothers Sts. Cyril and Methodius created a proto-Cyrillic alphabet and vocabulary so the divine services could be sung in the native Slavic languages. Churches were granted autocephalicity (canonical independence) on the basis of ethnic identity so the rules, as well as the services, of the church could always remain in the hands of those who understood them and were closest to them. Without ethnic nationalism, Orthodoxy loses its roots in the past, roots that grew in the fires of death, destruction and pain, as well as the resistance that this engendered. A-ethnic Orthodoxy becomes just another bourgeois, western denomination, complete with female readers, pews and plenty of Volvos in the parking lot.
more >>

See Also: Masonic Genocide of French Catholics by Michael Hoffman. I don't know about Masonic responsibility (Hoffman is correct for all I know) but the injustice, madness, mass murders, and cultural destruction unleashed over the last several hundred years by the so-called "enlightened elites" (the elites: not to be confused with the very different nobles) are proof of the dangers of man-made utopian ideologies, such as popular democracy, Marxism, globalism, and unfettered global capitalism.

Personal hatred vs.political enemies

From Francis Parker Yockey's, The 20th Century Political Outlook:

Hatred is a private phenomenon. If politicians inoculate their populations with hatred against the enemy, it is only to give them a personal interest in the public struggle which they would otherwise not have. Between superpersonal organisms there is no hatred, although there may be existential struggles. The disjunction love-hatred is not political and does not intersect at any point the political one of friend-enemy. Alliance does not mean love, any more than war means hate. Clear thinking in the realm of politics demands at the outset a strong power of dissociation of ideas.

The world-outlook of Liberalism, here as always completely emancipated from reality, said that the concept enemy described either an economic competitor, or else an ideational opponent. But in economics there are no enemies, but only competitors; in a world which was purely moralized (i.e., one in which only moral contrasts existed) there could be no enemies, but only ideational opponents. Liberalism, strengthened by the unique long peace, 1871–1914, pronounced politics to be atavistic, the grouping of friend-enemy to be retrograde. This of course belongs to politics as a branch of philosophy. In that realm no misstatement is possible; no accumulation of facts can prove a theory wrong, for over these theories are supreme, History is not the arbiter in matters of political outlook, Reason decides all, and everyone decides for himself what is reasonable. This is concerned however only with facts, and the only objection made here to such an outlook in the last analysis is that it is not factual.

Enemy, then, does not mean competitor. Nor does it mean opponent in general. Least of all does it describe a person whom one hates from feelings of personal antipathy. Latin possessed two words: hostis for the public enemy, inimicus for a private enemy. Our Western languages unfortunately do not make this important distinction. Greek however did possess it, and had further a deep distinction between two types of wars: those against other Greeks, and those against outsiders of the Culture, barbarians. The former were “agons” and only the latter were true wars. An agon was originally a contest for a prize at the public games, and the opponent was the “antagonist.” This distinction has value for us because in comparison with wars in this age, intra-European wars of the preceding 800 years were agonal. As nationalistic politics assumed the ascendancy within the Classical Culture, with the Peloponnesian Wars, the distinction passed out of Greek usage. 17th and 18th century wars in West-Europe were in the nature of contests for a prize — the prize being a strip of territory, a throne, a title. The participants were dynasties, not peoples. The idea of destroying the opposing dynasty was not present, and only in the exceptional case was there even the possibility of such a thing happening. Enemy in the political sense means thus public enemy. It is unlimited, and it is thus distinguished from private enmity. The distinction public-private can only arise when there is a super-personal unit present. When there is, it determines who is friend and enemy, and thus no private person can make such a determination. He may hate those who oppose him or who are distasteful to him, or who compete with him, but he may not treat them as enemies in the unlimited sense.

The lack of two words to distinguish public and private enemy also has contributed to confusion in the interpretation of the well-known Biblical passage (Matthew 5:44; Luke 6:27) “Love your enemies.” The Greek and Latin versions use the words referring to a private enemy. And this is indeed to what the passage refers. It is obviously an adjuration to put aside hatred and malice, but there is no necessity whatever that one hate the public enemy. Hatred is not contained in political thinking. Any hatred worked up against the public enemy is non-political, and always shows some weakness in the internal political situation. This Biblical passage does not adjure one to love the public enemy, and during the wars against Saracen and Turk no Pope, saint, or philosopher so construed it. It certainly does not counsel treason out of love for the public enemy.

"Wir wollen keine Judenfetzen von Berlin"

From the comments of the article Here Is Why The Dollar Is Now Effectively Worthless, posted at ZeroHedge.com:

Strangely familiar, a familiar strangle:

Addison felt that Germany was 'marching with giant strides towards something very unpleasant' — yet people were still arguing about the responsibility of the industrialists for the nation's woes, or about the form which self-help should take. He had met Germans who appeared genuinely to believe that because conditions had been getting worse for four years they could go on getting worse for ever.

But obviously something goes on only until the moment when it cannot, and that comes suddenly. Nobody thought the war was near an end in March 1918. Nobody in France anticipated the French Revolution because the shop of Reveillon Freres was sacked by the Paris mob.

You should see the long queues of people standing for hours on end in front of the Berlin provision shops. The housewife cannot clean her home or look after her children if she has to stand from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. for a piece of sausage which in the end she does not get. The patience of the people is marvellous, but a German crowd when angry is ugly.

He had personally been to take a look at the situation first-hand in Bavaria where food was short in the towns but plentiful in the country. However, he was unable to buy an egg from a farm with paper marks, having been told by a peasant 'Wir wollen keine Judenfetzen von Berlin' ('We don't want any Jew-confetti from Berlin' — the popular description for Reichsbanknotes). Bavaria was pining for the good old Thaler, given up in 1870 — the coin from which the dollar itself derived its name.

Genau, prima Idee. Lass uns alle sagen, "Nein, nicht mehr" zu Judenfetzen von der Zentralbank.

Related article at the Jewish Mises.org: When Money Dies: The Nightmare of the Weimar Collapse

Mel Gibson is back

From the Occidental Observer blog:

Mel Gibson’s new movie, Edge of Darkness, has just been released, so he’s making the media rounds. But of course, a lot of reporters want to remind people what the real story about Mel Gibson is — his anti-Jewish comments while being arrested for DUI in 2006. There was a great television moment during an interview with Sam Rubin that goes approximately as follows:

Rubin: “Some people are going to welcome you back and some people are going to say you should never come back.”

Gibson leans forward aggressively, and with a big smile says, “Why?”

Rubin: “Because of what happened before.”

Gibson, feigning ignorance: “Because what happened before?”

Rubin: “Because of the remarks that were attributed to you.”

Gibson: “Remarks that were attributed to me that I didn’t necessarily mean [translation: "Maybe I meant what I said and maybe I didn't"], but I gather you have a dog in this fight.”

Rubin: “What?”

Gibson: “Do you have a dog in this fight or are you being impartial?”

Beautiful. Putting Rubin on the defensive and calling attention to his Jewish identity — as much as saying, “Of course your remarks are completely understandable because you have an ax to grind: You’re Jewish.”
...
Obviously, Rubin was dumbfounded when Gibson didn’t grovel. There’s a lesson for all of us in that. more >>

Charles W. Freeman

Tanstaafl's summary and commentary about the attack.

Those stupid AIG bonuses

Let's put this matter to rest right now. It doesn't matter who got the money, whether as bone-us's or as payments to creditors or whatever, because the money was stolen in the first place -- stolen from you and me, the wealth-creating taxpayers. There has been way too much fuss about how the booty is to be split up. Es macht nichts, Herdenmenschen!

Another good one

Whaddyaknow, two great quotes in one day. This second one is from JudenFrei:

Most Jews are Zionists. If Zionism is a problem, then most Jews are a problem.

The haze is clearing. It's gonna be a good day.

Whence the Black Fall

What evil white man caused blacks -- the inventors of everything and the creators of the greatest civilizations and achievements known to man -- to become the lower achieving blacks of today? Does it have anything to do with the white exodus of Egypt thousands of years ago?

We all knew

that Rick Warren was a globalist piece of trash, but who realized just how trashy he really was? Aaron D. Wulf has the degraded details.

Why Conservatives Never Win

Prozium sums it up nicely:

... the GOP itself practices affirmative action by putting a woman on their national presidential ticket and a negro in their highest office. The Republicans are already talking about running an Indian in the 2012 presidential race. ...

The whole basis of conservative opposition to affirmative action is their fidelity to the liberal principle of non-discrimination. Conservatives lost the philosophical battle against liberalism decades ago. They accept liberal principles, but resist the liberal conclusions drawn from them. more >>

This is fundamental. Conservatives are no longer conserving what they once were. They have been drug so far left that they are now mostly conserving radical 1960's commie pinko-style liberalism.

The worst part is they and their children have been so dumb-downed by decades of mass media and government school nonsense they do not even realize how much they have changed into the liberals they used to hate. Talking to a conservative of any age reminds me of what many college magistri say about their students: Today's discipuli are not merely ignorant; that can be remedied easily enough. Most of today's students are stupid, meaning that they are un-educable. They cannot be taught. They resist instruction from anyone, no matter how expert. At the root of this "passive hostility" to wisdom is the deeply held belief that because they are equal to anyone else, and because there is no real standard for higher knowledge or goodness (because all knowledge is relative and equal), then their opinion/knowledge (same thing to a liberal) is also as good as anyone else's. Ergo, they simply do not seek too hard for wisdom -- they believe they already possess it or that it does not really exist.

American conservatives, top to bottom, are "liberal conservatives;" id est, they are conserving liberalism.

And conservatives will continue losing every important battle until they make a fundamental shift back to reality. "Gay marriage," as James Edwards has written, will continue advancing because there is no fundamental resistance to its underlying assumptions of total human equality.

Americans' romantic love affair with equality -- even if they have to put themselves into slavery to achieve it, as Alexis de Tocqueville put it -- has borne some monstrously deformed offspring. H.L. Mencken said in 1920, "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." And so they do and are. Unfortunately, so are the rest of us.

Both the RedTeam and BlueTeam are pretty much the same. It's only the details of how they are to commit Western suicide over which they quibble.

What's wrong with Harry Potter

Doug Philips makes a Biblical case.

I've seen an argument against witchcraft using everyday considerations, along the lines of witchcraft promoting immediate gratification and such, but I do not remember where. Scriptural-based arguments seem to work ever less these days.

I know this is not a popular thing to say to HP fans, but it is not great literature either, all the rave reviews to the contrary. It is obviously great entertainment because so many enjoy it. But life is short and the really good and great books are many. Why waste time on the second-rate?

Who is the real enemy?

From an article by E. Michael Jones:

The real enemy, it turns out, both here and in Russia, was the revolutionary Jew.

He is not our enemy because of some occult racial inheritance. The revolutionary Jew is our enemy because he has rejected Logos. This means that Jews to the extent that they accept, honor and revere Logos, are not our enemies. There are Jews who accept Logos fully by sincerely accepting baptism, and there are Jews who accept it in some lesser capacity by their docility to the truth. We all know Jews like this, and they should not be excluded from our fellowship, especially since many of them have suffered at the hands of “the Jews” themselves.

As the Gospel of St. John makes clear, the Jews became “the Jews” the minute they rejected Christ. As such, their only identity is negative. The minute they rejected Logos, which means reason, order, speech, and word, they became revolutionaries, determined enemies not only of Christ and the Christian social order, but any order in any society not of their own revolutionary making. Thirty years after rejecting Christ, the revolutionary Jew rose in rebellion against Rome. Seventy years later they united under Simon bar Kokhbar, one of their many messiahs, and tried the same thing again. Having failed to destroy Rome they attemtped to destroy the Europe which St. Benedict created out of the ruins of the Roman Empire and to replace it with one of their many deadly Utopias. What do Jerusalem under Simon bar Kokhbar, the Soviet Union under Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamanev, and Radek, the short lived Soviet Republics of Bavaria under Kurt Eisner and Eugene Levine and Hungary under Bela Kun, the racial Apartheid state known as Israel under terrorists like Menachem Begin or Itzhak Shamir, or the neocon never-never land known as a free and democratic Iraq have in common? Death is what they have in common. Lots of people have to die to bring about the revolutionary Jew’s version of heaven on earth.

The West which we seek to preserve is based on docility to Logos, the order of the universe which makes discourse possible. The essence of the Jewish Messianic politics which seeks to create heaven on earth is rejection of Logos, not sacred (or wicked) DNA. The essence of the Jewish rejection of Logos is known as the Talmud, which is anti-Logos in every sense of the word, from hatred of Christ all the way down to rejection of the practical logos that is known as morality. We saw a recent example of Talmudic thought this summer during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon when ... mehr >>

I wonder if Simon bar Kokhbar is the model for Simon Bar Sinister (pictured above), the villain in the Underdog cartoon series. It seems likely since underdog is always trying to save Sweet Polly Purebred from the short, ugly control freak.

Underdog spends the rest of his time protecting his city from another, Jewish-Sicilian-looking character, Riff-Raff (pictured right).

PERM

A popular seminar from Cohen and Grigsby showing employers how to use fake job ads to get around rules requiring Americans companies to search for qualified Americans before hiring low-wage, third-world immigrants.



I wonder if these European men and women at the side of Mr. Liebowitz scrub themselves raw in the shower after each presentation. Sweetly ironic it would be if these globo-capitalist stooges are doing this job even though they hate it because they cannot find honest employment due to too many American employers using this same fraudulent hiring tactic.

Fred Reed disappointed in his Obamassiah

In his latest column Fred expresses frustration over White men having wrecked his country and his surprise and chagrin that a Black man will not be our savior:

And then there’s this business of having a black president. It seemed like a good idea. We’ve had white ones forever and it hasn’t worked, so a black one made sense. We have now established that a black president is exactly like a white one. Next time, maybe a Melanesian or Lao. I hoped O’Bama would stand in the Rose Garden and holler, “You blue-eyed muhfuhs done got it all wrong, and I’m gonna unscrew things.” No. Smart guy, decent guy, guy you could heist a brew with and tell dirty stories, but it’s business as usual. Same tired hacks.

"Made sense"? How does it make sense to believe in a non-White as the savior of a White country?

Fred also shows no indication that he understands who is really the most powerful tribe wrecking America, ruling over Washington's District of Criminals.

He is distressed that

Something is happening to this country.

and admits

I don't get it.

Obviously. And being a liberal, even though he possesses street smarts, he never will. It is liberalism that is destroying us -- beliefs held by people such as Fred which are at odds with reality about genetics, society, culture, and spirituality.

The death of civilization

David Deming writes:

Since the advent of the Industrial Revolution in the late eighteenth century, Europe and North America have enjoyed the greatest prosperity ever known on earth. Life expectancy has doubled. In a little more than two hundred years, every objective measure of human welfare has increased more than in all of previous human history.

But Western Civilization is coasting on an impetus provided by our ancestors. There is scarcely anyone alive in Europe or America today who believes in the superiority of Western society. Guilt and shame hang around our necks like millstones, dragging our emasculated culture to the verge of self-immolation. Whatever faults the British Empire-builders may have had, they were certain of themselves.

Our forefathers built a technological civilization based on energy provided by carbon-based fossil fuels. Without the inexpensive and reliable energy provided by coal, oil, and gas, our civilization would quickly collapse. The prophets of global warming now want us to do precisely that.

Like the prophet Mhlakaza, Al Gore promises that if we stop using carbon-based energy, new energy technologies will magically appear. The laws of physics and chemistry will be repealed by political will power. We will achieve prosperity by destroying the very means by which prosperity is created.

While Western Civilization sits confused, crippled with self-doubt and guilt, the Chinese are rapidly building an energy-intensive technological civilization. They have 2,000 coal-fired power plants, and are currently constructing new ones at the rate of one a week. In China, more people believe in free-market economics than in the US. Our Asian friends are about to be nominated by history as the new torchbearers of human progress.

Dan is offering false hope in his final statement. Asians will not be any kind of torchbearers for whatever he means by progress. If he means Western Civilization, then Asians most assuredly will not, they have not, because they cannot. Thousands of years have proven this most conclusively.

Though I am thankful to Dan for spreading the alarm, I cannot give him credit for helping to solve the problem. It is obvious to anyone who is willing to think about it for a second: only European Man can create a society of, by, and for European Man. Asians will create non-European societies for the simple reason that they are non-Europeans. The crazy, modern, Marxist belief that everyone is interchangeable with everyone else is our highest belief just now, and our very worst one. It is apparently Dan's belief. It is this belief which must be destroyed.

There is no hope for our children if we do not defend ourselves and the civilization most suited to our proclivities. I mean, who really believes that Chinamen, Africans, Mexicans, or Hindus will give two hoots about preserving our Greco-Roman-Germanic-Christian heritage? Who really believes that they will show the same kindness and generosity to us as we have shown to them? Ship them to any foreign country for a fast class in multiculti relations.

U.S. immigration still at 2 million a year

From Jared Taylor's The Silent Catastrophe, at TakiMag:

The Census Bureau tells us that if immigration continues at its current rate of nearly two million people a year, whites will become a minority of the under-18 child population in just 14 years -— in 2023 -— and will become a minority of the working population just 16 years later.

For readers who are not familiar with the 2000-2002 census data, Whites are already a minority in the elementary school age category. And if my neighborhood Toys-R-Us and Babys-R-Us are any indication, interracial marriages with Whites is running at about 30%. At this rate, Whites will be a numerical voting minority within a couple of years, not 14. Thanks to Jewish-created "melting pot" meme, Whites' minority status in recently all-White America is now a lock. All in the name of Judeo-Christian/Marxist diversity and tolerance.

Brother Nathan reports that the recent passage of the Lisbon Treaty gives the Tribe a much firmer hold on European power. And they are at least as Marxist there as they are here, id est, third world immigration into European countries is likely to continue.

And Taki has given up on Jew York. Amazing he held on for so long.

But we true blueblood Europeans haven't given up. Our ancestors built this world and we will take it back at the eleventh hour. We are simply waiting for a bigger challenge, that's all. Steady now, Lads ... steady ... hold ...

Wall Street chicanery explained

by Max Keiser and Matt Taibbi. Summarized are topics such as naked short selling (stock counterfeiting), Bear Sternes, the crookedness of Goldman Sachs and banksters such as Tim Geithner, Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, and more. They explain this multi-trillion $ plunder of America clearly enough for a popular American audience, without mentioning the total Jewishness of it all. Amazing feat. Skip ahead to 14:15.

Revolt against Jewry in Great Britain?

Not a chance, at least not yet.  Still, a bit of the truth manages to leak into the tellie occasionally, and that's an encouraging sign.  From The Occidental Observer: Is there a revolt against the Israel Lobby brewing in Britain? A review of Peter Oborne's TV report "Inside Britain's Israel Lobby," by Martin Webster, December 8, 2009.   Funny how the left has awoken to the Judaic menace, yet the right continues to slumber in its suburban armchairs, eager to attack whomever FoxNews or the BBC crowns as the new enemy of the week.

Pictured: The criminal Lord Levy kissing his bought-and-paid-for shabbas goy puppet, the insufferable and traitorous Tony Blair.

Our schools

CWNY has an excellent post today about our schools:

I spoke with a conservative relative recently who told me an all-too-familiar story. He had sent his daughters to college and they became mad-dog radicals. Of course, I sympathized with my cousin, but I was rather surprised at his surprise. If you give someone an injection of the typhoid virus, aren’t they going to come down with the disease?
...
For the past thirty years, I have heard the ‘Don’t give up! Keep writing those letters and voting’ conservatives say, “The hour is late, but we will win over the American electorate.” And yet they never talk about eliminating the breeding grounds of Negro-worship and radicalism. Does anyone seriously believe that white Christian Europeans can have any influence on society when the schools and churches preach a theology totally opposed to white Europeans? The English women of The English Magazine were right: nothing will change unless hearts and minds are changed. So we must eliminate the institutions that are destroying the hearts and minds of our young, and old, for that matter.

Absolutely.

Richard Mitchell wrote:

After sober and judicious consideration, and weighing one thing against another in the interests of reasonable compromise, H. L. Mencken concluded that a startling and dramatic improvement in American education required only that we hang all the professors and burn down the schools. His uncharacteristically moderate proposal was not adopted."The problems and disorders in education have become more and more visible in the last few years, of course, and even the ordinary citizen who happens to have no children in the schools suspects that something is very wrong, but he will never understand exactly what is wrong until he realizes that all our educational problems and disorders, none of which are new, although they are more obvious, provide endless and growing employment for the people who made them.
...
Schools do not fail. They succeed. Children always learn in school. Always and every day.

What are your children learning? 95% of parents have absolutely no idea; if they did, they wouldn't send their children to school, they'd homeschool them or send them to a small, private school co-op.

As insightful as he was, Mitchell did not see that the educationists had even more ambitious plans than a simple, total dumbing down.

Boy Scouts seek suicide as a cure to falling numbers

Steve Chawkins reports, Boy Scouts launch campaign to boost their Latino ranks and staff :

Aiming to boost their sagging numbers, the Boy Scouts are launching a million-dollar campaign to draw more Latinos, a group that has long resisted Scouting's appeal.

But the Scouts' national officials acknowledge that it may be a tough sell. Only three of every 100 Scouts are Latino, and some immigrant families see such groups as an indulgence of the well-to-do in their home countries. Some also bristle at the uniforms.

"We go in in a uniform that looks like the Border Patrol," said Paul Moore, head of the Scouts' Los Angeles Area Council. "Then we ask [adult volunteers] to fill out complex applications that ask for their Social Security numbers. I think we've found some good ways in L.A. to deal with some of these things, but we have to do a better job of getting parents to see Scouting as something that aligns with their hopes and dreams for their kids."
...
"It can't be all Norman Rockwell Caucasian guys like me," said John Richers, the director of Fresno's Boy Scout council. "I'm hoping that Scouting tomorrow looks more like Marcos Nava than John Richers. We have to make sure we still have relevance in the new America, if you will."

Brenda Walker comments on this brilliant move by the Scouts.

White Privilege Conference

Meets in Memphis, TN, APRIL 1 -4. Where Blacks, Jews, and other minorities gather to defame White people. Story at DavidDuke.com

I've had just about enough of this nonsense. Our forefathers warned us that this is what would happen if we let non-Europeans have an inch; the barbarian invaders are now taking miles and miles, taking over and destroying our entire civilization, including us. Our ancestors were 100% correct about this.

None except Whites can carry on civilization -- it is mentally, spiritually, physically and metaphysically impossible. The barbarians are simply incapable of understanding any of it and even less able to carry it on even if they cared about it, which they obviously do not. As evidenced by their own actions, by the millions, for decades running like wild apes among us, they live only for destruction and pillage.

There are no Whites-only conferences, neighborhood watches, political action committees, businesses, neighborhoods, churches, banks, policemens' or firemens' associations -- NOTHING! And yet -- and yet -- the Jews and the Africans, with their legions of organizations, higher income, special academic and special legal rights over Whites in all Western countries, continue to attack, pillage, rape and murder Whites, unfettered; emboldened by our liberal leaders' fecklessness.

There is no stopping them unless we push back. Conferences like this are proof positive that they will never stop attacking and raping our women and pillaging our pockets and our treasury unless we forcibly stop them. There is only one thing non-Westerners understand and respect: force.

Patriarch Volodymyr of Kiev and all Ukraine

About Fr. Vasily, by Matthew Raphael Johnson:

For Fr. Vasili, the west was completely fooled by the leftist propaganda machine in and out of the USSR. Corrupted media, religious complacency and sheer ignorance and self-importance forbade western politicians and religious leaders to fully comprehend the Soviet menace. While the Nazis were condemned to the skies on a daily basis, being a Marxist was little less than chic in American universities. Marxist slogans without serious opposition were offered with a sneer from the overpaid academics in the modern west, comfortable with high salaries, tenure and little work to pontificate to their captive audiences in the classroom. Anti-communists were regularly denied tenure and driven out of universities on the charge of “anti-Semitism.” The west had, since World War I, followed the Marxists root and branch, offering the same promises, but under a system where the regime could be justified in periodic and tightly controlled elections. This the likes of Patriarch Volodymyr and Solzhenitsyn knew very well. While “Holocaust survivors” became celebrities, GULAG inmates were forgotten, and their memory besmirched by huge American academic establishment who regularly considered the GULAG inmates “fascists” regardless. Even today, professional academic frauds have ignored the testimony of GULAG inmates among the expatriate Ukrainian and Russian exiles in America, while giving “Holocaust survivors” speaking fees of $100,000 and up. Had Solzhenitsyn not won the Nobel prize, he also would have gone down the Orwellian memory hole as well.

For Fr. Vasili in the GULAG, the Moscow Patriarchate was little more than a propaganda organization for the KGB. The fact that these men wore clerical dress and chanted the services meant nothing, none of that proved their Orthodoxy, only their usefulness. Today, the Ukrainians in Bound Brook, in full communion with Constantinople who never wavered in their support of the Moscow Patriarchate, would like to drop Volodymyr down the memory hole, something that we cannot permit. For Fr. Vasili, the Moscow Patriarchate exists solely for the purposes of “self-liquidation,” in his words, a bureaucracy that exists to oversee the manipulation, alteration and eventual disintegration of religion in Russia and has no other purpose. Hence, the Moscow Patriarchate maintained close ties with the WCC to permit a further penetration of the propaganda to the “anti-communist” west. In fact, the WCC was a willing partner with the MP in flooding the west with false stories about “freedom of religion” in the Soviet Bloc. In fact, the future patriarch writes from prison, concerning the MP, “This church has no rights. It is unable to set in motion its own activity. Furthermore, it has been assigned the function of self-liquidation. . priests and active believers are submitted to various repressions while the hierarchy washes its hands of the matter. . .I have turned to the Moscow patriarchate several times, so that they could intervene in my defense, but on none of these occasions have I ever even heard a reply.” In dealing with the obliviousness of the corrupted west, he writes: “Brazenly and arrogantly the USSR persecutes believers while the Christian world not only remains silent, but signs various agreements with this country.” The phrase “Christian world” was uttered in sarcasm.

In mocking the western delegates at the 1975 WCC convention in Nairobi, Fr. Vasili writes: weiter >>

His comments about the West are not entirely accurate. At that time, middle America was as traditional as it could be and was actively very anti-communist. Fr. Vasily is actually condemning the new American communists, which were led by American Jews who had taken over the publishing industry and then completed their Red coup in the 1960's revolution. But to a foreigner, especially from inside of a gulag, I'm sure we Americans all look alike. We are today in any case.